a5c7b9f00b In Washington, Senator Charlie Roan is disputing the Presidential election running against the New Founding Fathers&#39; candidate Minister Edwidge Owens (Kyle Secor). She claims that the NFFA uses The Purge with economical purpose to get rid of poor and sick people and is the favorite to win. The BFFA leaders plot a scheme revoking the protection of government officials to kill Roan. Her chief of security Leo Barnes uses his agents and snipers to protect Roan, but there is a breach in the security system created by two agents that betray Barnes and a paramilitary group breaks in the house killing the loyal agents and snipers. However Barnes and Roan succeeds in escaping but Barnes is shot on the shoulder. They are captured by a group of Russian tourists and rescued by two locals that are protecting a store. They call their friends and they decide to protect the Senator until the next day. Will they succeed in protecting Roan? Former Police Sergeant Barnes becomes head of security for Senator Charlie Roan, a Presidential candidate targeted for death on Purge night due to her vow to eliminate the Purge. Am another person who didn&#39;t care at all for &#39;The Purge&#39; from 2013. It wasn&#39;t completely unwatchable with a couple of reasonable performances and decent production values but was so tension and suspense-free and full of irritating characters, illogical character behaviours, a dull pace, a cheesy script and tired clichés.<br/><br/>Had seen and heard numerous times people saying that &#39;The Purge: Anarchy&#39; was a much better film. Will admit that due to disliking &#39;The Purge&#39; so much, part of me was very unsureto whether to watch &#39;The Purge: Anarchy&#39; and very nearly didn&#39;t watch it. Seeing it, it was indeed a much better film. Decided too to see &#39;The Purge: Election Year&#39; to see whether the series would continue to improve or whether it would wear thin. Having watched it, &#39;The Purge: Election Year&#39; is far from great and has major flaws but it was not a bad watch,far&#39;The Purge&#39; films go it is an easy second best, the best being &#39;Anarchy&#39;.<br/><br/>Visually, the slick and gritty look suits the film well and the effects and such are notsloppybefore. It&#39;s ominously and not overbearingly scored and assured enough, while boasting enough, though with much room for more, fun, tension, eeriness and shocks. &#39;The Purge: Election Year&#39; starts quite well and elaborates upon what happens before and approaches it from a different angle instead of being a re-hash.<br/><br/>Frank Grillo is a fully committed lead, although his character was far better written in &#39;Anarchy&#39;. Elizabeth Mitchell matches him with dignity and professionalism and their chemistry gives some urgency and heart. Mykelti Williamson is good fun. <br/><br/>However, the story execution doesn&#39;t feel fresh, with tired clichés, very variable attempts at twists and too many parts that don&#39;t ring true and not always plausible. The character development is still wafer thin, with the villains being ciphers that are not threating and actually being pretty stupid and a few characters don&#39;t serve much point. None of the characters are quiteannoyingthose in &#39;The Purge&#39;, but the questionable and illogical decision making and behaviours remain still. <br/><br/>Dialogue continues to be rather weak, lacking tautness and being awkward and silly, complete with rather heavy-handed and over-emphasised political elements. Would have liked more tension and suspense, while they are here there is not enough of either, and tighter pacing would have helped, the middle act does drag.<br/><br/>Overall, not much special but has its moments. 5/10 Bethany Cox Disposable African Americans and Latin Americans help bulletproof Caucasian hero protecting White Savior Lady in the name of the American Way. White Savior Lady tells Disposable Blacks that retaliating by force against genocide is wrong. They need to believe in the system, the same system that is wiping them out. I know that the Anti-NFFA are a reference to The Black Panters Party, but the original Black Panters were Maoists and the present ones have a dialogue with Anarchism (real Anarchism, like Kropotkin and Lucy Parsons) and the thing they never were is supportive of the capitalist republic, like the group in the film trying to pave the way for a savior president. That &quot;If you do that, you&#39;ll be just like them!&quot; talk is really, really silly after they&#39;d already killed their way through, but the main bad guy is too important to be killed? So the main message of the movie is anyone may die except for some special few, including the fascist zealot that is the main bad guy!? After three disturbingly violent films, this may be a concept that deserves to be purged.
Vipillwatchlung Admin replied
295 weeks ago